Cervical Cancer Screening in Women With Physical Disabilities.

TitleCervical Cancer Screening in Women With Physical Disabilities.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2025
AuthorsVinson, AH, Norrid, C, Haro, EK, Ernst, S, Khoury, CEl, Alves, ML, Kieber-Emmons, A, Mulki, AKamath, Butcher, EA, Kalpakjian, C, McKee, MM, Harper, DM
JournalJAMA Netw Open
Volume8
Issue1
Paginatione2457290
Date Published2025 Jan 02
ISSN2574-3805
KeywordsAdult, Aged, Early Detection of Cancer, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Persons with Disabilities, Pilot Projects, Qualitative Research, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Cervical cancer screening is a crucial public health intervention, but screening disparities exist for women with physical disabilities (WWPD).

OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences of WWPD with both traditional speculum examination-based screening and at-home self-sampling for cervical cancer screening.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study enrolled 56 WWPD to test self-sampling kits, provide feedback via a survey, and participate in a qualitative interview. An interprofessional team conducted semistructured interviews with 16 key informants and 40 pilot participants for 56 WWPD from November 1, 2021, through April 30, 2023. All completed a self-administered quantitative survey. Key informants' experiences with 4 self-sampling devices helped determine which 2 self-sampling kits would be offered to participants in a pilot study.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: A coding scheme was developed to represent inductive codes generated through preliminary coding and deductive codes representing domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework. This coding scheme was used to conduct a 2-pass thematic analysis.

RESULTS: Of the 56 WWPD (mean [SD] age, 45.4 [9.1] years) who participated in the study, 28 (50.0%) were up to date with cervical cancer screening. Participants described accessibility barriers and clinician ableism that made speculum-based in-office examinations difficult, leading some participants to delay or avoid screening. In contrast, participants described self-screening as more comfortable and convenient, regardless of whether they prefer future speculum-based screening. Their responses also allowed for the exploration of how screening preferences may impact future screening behavior.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Interviews with WWPD suggested that access to self-sampling screening options would be more comfortable for cervical cancer screening participation. Understanding participants' experiences with self-sampling devices generates insights into improving screening experiences for WWPD.

DOI10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57290
Alternate JournalJAMA Netw Open
PubMed ID39878976
PubMed Central IDPMC11780472