"Goals of Care Conversations Don't Fit in a Box": Hospice Staff Experiences and Perceptions of Advance Care Planning Quality Measurement.

Title"Goals of Care Conversations Don't Fit in a Box": Hospice Staff Experiences and Perceptions of Advance Care Planning Quality Measurement.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2021
AuthorsHunt, LJ, Garrett, SB, Dressler, G, Sudore, R, Ritchie, CS, Harrison, KL
JournalJ Pain Symptom Manage
Volume61
Issue5
Pagination917-927
Date Published2021 May
ISSN1873-6513
KeywordsAdvance Care Planning, Communication, Hospice Care, Hospices, Humans, Perception
Abstract

CONTEXT: With rising concerns about quality of care in hospice, federal agencies recently began mandating quality measurement in hospice, including measures of advance care planning (ACP).

OBJECTIVES: To characterize hospice providers' experiences with ACP quality measurement and their reflections on ways to improve it.

METHODS: Semi-structured in-depth interviews of fifty-one hospice providers from various clinical backgrounds and organizational roles in four geographically diverse non-profit, community-based hospices in the U.S. Participants were queried about their experiences with and barriers to ACP quality measurement processes in their organization, opinions about the impacts of federally mandated quality measures, and ideas for improvement. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis with an interdisciplinary team, facilitated by ATLAS.ti and Excel.

RESULTS: Four key findings of the ACP quality measurement experience for hospice staff included variation, barriers, attitudes, and recommendations for improvement. 1) Variation: Within and across organizations, participants applied a variety of processes to measure ACP quality, and exposure to and experiences with quality measurement varied based on organizational role. 2) Barriers: ACP quality measurement was impeded by limited resources, technological problems, and measurement challenges. 3) Attitudes: Participants' opinions of recently implemented federally mandated requirements for ACP quality measurement highlighted numerous downsides, unintended consequences, and few upsides. 4) Recommendations: improvements included personalizing ACP quality measures, elevating the importance of quality measurement, and streamlining processes.

CONCLUSION: Hospice staff take ACP quality measurement seriously, but insufficient organizational resources and regulatory bureaucracy create challenges. Efforts to enhance ACP quality measure nuance and assess outcomes are needed to improve care.

DOI10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.042
Alternate JournalJ Pain Symptom Manage
PubMed ID33096214
PubMed Central IDPMC8055723
Grant ListKL2 TR001870 / TR / NCATS NIH HHS / United States
K01 AG059831 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
T32 HS022241 / HS / AHRQ HHS / United States
L30 AG060590 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
U24 NR014637 / NR / NINR NIH HHS / United States
T35 AG026736 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
U2C NR014637 / NR / NINR NIH HHS / United States
P30 AG044281 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
K24 AG054415 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
P30 AG062422 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States