Title | "Goals of Care Conversations Don't Fit in a Box": Hospice Staff Experiences and Perceptions of Advance Care Planning Quality Measurement. |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2021 |
Authors | Hunt, LJ, Garrett, SB, Dressler, G, Sudore, R, Ritchie, CS, Harrison, KL |
Journal | J Pain Symptom Manage |
Volume | 61 |
Issue | 5 |
Pagination | 917-927 |
Date Published | 2021 May |
ISSN | 1873-6513 |
Keywords | Advance Care Planning, Communication, Hospice Care, Hospices, Humans, Perception |
Abstract | CONTEXT: With rising concerns about quality of care in hospice, federal agencies recently began mandating quality measurement in hospice, including measures of advance care planning (ACP). OBJECTIVES: To characterize hospice providers' experiences with ACP quality measurement and their reflections on ways to improve it. METHODS: Semi-structured in-depth interviews of fifty-one hospice providers from various clinical backgrounds and organizational roles in four geographically diverse non-profit, community-based hospices in the U.S. Participants were queried about their experiences with and barriers to ACP quality measurement processes in their organization, opinions about the impacts of federally mandated quality measures, and ideas for improvement. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis with an interdisciplinary team, facilitated by ATLAS.ti and Excel. RESULTS: Four key findings of the ACP quality measurement experience for hospice staff included variation, barriers, attitudes, and recommendations for improvement. 1) Variation: Within and across organizations, participants applied a variety of processes to measure ACP quality, and exposure to and experiences with quality measurement varied based on organizational role. 2) Barriers: ACP quality measurement was impeded by limited resources, technological problems, and measurement challenges. 3) Attitudes: Participants' opinions of recently implemented federally mandated requirements for ACP quality measurement highlighted numerous downsides, unintended consequences, and few upsides. 4) Recommendations: improvements included personalizing ACP quality measures, elevating the importance of quality measurement, and streamlining processes. CONCLUSION: Hospice staff take ACP quality measurement seriously, but insufficient organizational resources and regulatory bureaucracy create challenges. Efforts to enhance ACP quality measure nuance and assess outcomes are needed to improve care. |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.042 |
Alternate Journal | J Pain Symptom Manage |
PubMed ID | 33096214 |
PubMed Central ID | PMC8055723 |
Grant List | KL2 TR001870 / TR / NCATS NIH HHS / United States K01 AG059831 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States T32 HS022241 / HS / AHRQ HHS / United States L30 AG060590 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States U24 NR014637 / NR / NINR NIH HHS / United States T35 AG026736 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States U2C NR014637 / NR / NINR NIH HHS / United States P30 AG044281 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States K24 AG054415 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States P30 AG062422 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States |