Quality Indicators for High-Need Patients: a Systematic Review.

TitleQuality Indicators for High-Need Patients: a Systematic Review.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2022
AuthorsSchneberk, T, Bolshakova, M, Sloan, K, Chang, E, Stal, J, Dinalo, J, Jimenez, E, Motala, A, Hempel, S
JournalJ Gen Intern Med
Volume37
Issue12
Pagination3147-3161
Date Published2022 Sep
ISSN1525-1497
KeywordsDelivery of Health Care, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Quality Indicators, Health Care
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthcare systems are increasingly implementing programs for high-need patients, who often have multiple chronic conditions and complex social situations. Little, however, is known about quality indicators that might guide healthcare organizations and providers in improving care for high-need patients. We sought to conduct a systematic review to identify potential quality indicators for high-need patients.

METHODS: This systematic review (CRD42020215917) searched PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE; guideline clearing houses ECRI and GIN; and Google scholar. We included publications suggesting, evaluating, and utilizing indicators to assess quality of care for high-need patients. Critical appraisal of the indicators addressed the development process, endorsement and adoption, and characteristics, such as feasibility. We standardized indicators by patient population subgroups to facilitate comparisons across different indicator groups.

RESULTS: The search identified 6964 citations. Of these, 1382 publications were obtained as full text, and 53 studies met inclusion criteria. We identified over 1700 quality indicators across studies. Quality indicator characteristics varied widely. The scope of the selected indicators ranged from detailed criterion (e.g., "annual eye exam") to very broad categories (e.g., "care coordination"). Some publications suggested disease condition-specific indicators (e.g., diabetes), some used condition-independent criteria (e.g., "documentation of the medication list in the medical record available to all care agencies"), and some publications used a mixture of indicator types.

DISCUSSION: We identified and evaluated existing quality indicators for a complex, heterogeneous patient group. Although some quality indicators were not disease-specific, we found very few that accounted for social determinants of health and behavioral factors. More research is needed to develop quality indicators that address patient risk factors.

DOI10.1007/s11606-022-07454-z
Alternate JournalJ Gen Intern Med
PubMed ID35260956
PubMed Central IDPMC9485370